
(Note:
Sample material is taken from uncorrected proofs. Changes may
be made prior to publication.)
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
AND DOCUMENTARY
From its
beginnings, the documentary enterprise has been largely understood
and practiced as a means of knowing the material, social world.
From the earliest days of filmmaking, when the Lumière
Brothers sent cameramen world-wide, documentary has been associated
with ethnography and empire. So, too, has documentary been considered
a means of providing visible evidence of social injustice, and
a powerful tool of national propaganda. Although the Lumière
records of family domesticity made routine life public, few families
had access to moving picture technology in the early twentieth
century, and far more rare was any means of public distribution
or exhibition of "home movies." As the century progressed,
documentary's links to journalism, social science and government
deepened and, consequently, exploration of personal subjectivity
was considered anathema to the documentary enterprise. Thus, curiosity
about private or psychological worlds (outside of narrative film)
found expression in experimental or avant-garde filmmaking.
As 16mm independent
filmmaking developed in the late 1940s and into the 1950s in the
United States, émigrés Maya Deren and Jonas Mekas
and American Stan Brakhage merged formal experimentation and subjectivity
in a cinema of personal revelation. The individual-and often idiosyncratic-filmmaker
became subject matter. Her or his inner life-revealed by dreams,
released by ritual, and universalized by myth-became the site
of interest (Dyer, 1990). These independently produced films,
exhibited publicly but narrowly, marked an important shift from
traditional documentary impulses to create a hybrid cinema that
combined documentation with creative interpretation (for example,
Mekas's diaries and Brakhage's films of lovemaking and his children's
births and growth). This experimental urge to explore subjectivity
continues as a potent influence for contemporary film and video
artists. Simultaneously, in the post-war years, home movie-making,
as a hobby, became an economic and technical possibility for many
middle-class families (Zimmerman, 1995). Using amateur gauges
and shown only in domestic environments, home movies of the fifties
and beyond would become important aesthetic and topical influences
as well as rich archival sources for autobiographical documentaries
made by professional film-makers.
A conflation
of technical and social changes-the introduction of lightweight,
relatively inexpensive 16mm equipment; a distrust of all things
official; the burgeoning women's movement; and a heightened interest
in the political dimensions of personal life in the late 1960s
and early 1970s-led to a surge in autobiographical filmmaking,
especially in the United States. One strain of autobiography employed
direct cinema methods to create motion picture diaries that emphasized
the immediacy, intensity, and unpredictability of experiencethe
mantra of direct cinemabut with one crucial difference:
the typical self-effacement of the direct cinema practitioner
was replaced by a focus on the film-maker whose life became the
film's subject. Thus, a potent configuration that was neither
pure direct cinema nor journalistic cinema vérité
was shaped from two dominant documentary styles of the period.
Jim McBride's seminal, darkly comic David Holzman's Diary
(1967) simultaneously introduced and satirized the form in a pseudo-documentary
that has become a template for the possibilities and excesses
of autobiographical documentary (and included in the [US] National
Film Registry). Callow, self-absorbed, by turns bullying and insecure,
Holzman (as played by L. M. Kit Carson) is the quintessential
film student who lives for filming and, consequently, has nothing
in his life worth filming. He violates his girlfriend's privacy,
bores his friends, but, amazingly, did not destroy a willingness
in other filmmakers to continue the format. Both the diary form
and McBride's entanglements in sexual politics were embraced earnestly
in Edward Pincus's multi-year exploration of open marriage and
family life in Diaries (1971-1976), and comically in Ross McElwee's
nervous journey to the American South in Sherman's March: A
Meditation on the Possibilities of Romantic Love in the South
during an Era of Nuclear Weapon Proliferation (1986). Pincus
was drawn to autobiographical production (as many others have
been) through interest in philosophy, phenomenology and politics.
His diary films have been influential in their exploration of
the concept of "presence"; in their investigation of
the interactive consequences of filming; and in their recognition
of subjectivity as the great problem of film (Lane, 2002).
However,
the diary form-shooting everyday events for a sustained period
of time and the construction of a subsequent narrative in chronological
order-has not been the dominant autobiographical documentary style.
More commonly, autodocumentaries combine observational footage
with interviews and archival materials to create life stories
situated historically, often organized achronologically, usually
with a voice-over narration by the filmmaker, and frequently bound
by the parameters of family life. By the mid-1970s, the proliferation
of film schools and the inauguration of feminist production and
exhibition networks increased opportunities for women film-makers.
This situation produced a concomitant increase in autobiographical
productions that centered on the complexities of intergenerational
relationships among women. Joyce Chopra's Joyce at 34 (1973);
Amalie R. Rothschild's Nana, Mom and Me (1974); Michelle
Citron's (partially) faux autobiographical Daughter Rite (1978),
and Chantal Ackerman's News from Home (1991) all interrogate
the complex, tenuous bonds between mothers and daughters, which
were undergoing special strain during a historical moment when
many Western women were resisting the values and expectations
that had driven their mothers' lives.
Feminist
critics have noted that patterns of openness and dialogic engagement
characterize women's autobiographical production (Lesage, 1999).
Intensified by the Lacanian turn in feminist film theory, autodocumentaries
made by both women and men (who were often either part of academe
or strongly influenced by it) demonstrated a heightened interest
in the consequences of patriarchy and frequently saw childhood
trauma as a defining autobiographical moment. Unsatisfactory relationships
with fathers saturate autodocumentary. Maxi Cohen's Joe and
Maxi (1978), Abraham Ravett's Everything's for You
(1989), Su Friedrich's Sink or Swim (1990), and Marco Williams's
In Search of Our Father (1992) are but a cluster from a
far larger pool of films that confront the primal father-child
bond and its lasting effects on the adult child.
Ethical issues
of consent, an abiding problematic in all documentary production,
are repositioned, rather than avoided, in autobiographical productions
that center on often volatile and fragile family relations (Katz
and Katz, 1988). Some autodocumentaries, such as Alan Berliner's
Nobody's Business (1996) are built around a family member's resistance
to participation in the construction of a family portrait. In
contrast to Oscar Berliner's pugnacious contempt for his son's
project (albeit a disdain that never erases the old man's affection
for his son), many autodocumentaries include a minor complaint,
or a slight hesitation, or a look of discomfort that is fleetingly
included amid a general appearance of cooperation, leaving the
viewer puzzled as to how strident off-camera resistance or edited
objections from family members might have been.
Incentives
toward self-inscription were numerous in the 1980s. Memoirs flooded
the book market, confessional talk shows filled the airwaves,
and autobiography seemed ubiquitous. A new expression, identity
politics, gained currency. Some of the spurs toward self-representation
were long in coming and well deserved. Widespread and sustained
critiques challenged the assumptions and presumptions of traditional
ethnographic work and fostered the growth of a documentary sub-genre
newly labeled autoethnography, in which members of (often maligned
or ignored) cultures and sub-cultures took control of the politics
of representation to produce work that investigated the cultural
through the personal, and vice-versa. Individuals whose identities
were partially constituted through membership in groups that had
been disenfranchised by earlier documentary work-people of color,
gays and lesbians, members of the working class, the chronically
or terminally ill and their families-embraced autoethnography.
Productions that joined the specificity of personal history with
broader cultural concerns resulted in a vibrant, oxymoronic form:
the collective autobiography. These collective autobiographies,
or autoethnographies, were bolstered by targeted federal support
in many nations in the West and made available to large audiences
through new venues for exhibition (for example, the P.O.V. series
on American public television and specialized film and video festivals,
such as gay and lesbian festivals, worldwide). Rea Tajiri (History
and Memory: for Akiko and Takashige, 1991), Marlon Riggs (Tongues
Untied, 1989), Tony Bubba (Lighting over Braddock,
1988), Derek Jarman (The Last of England, 1987; The
Garden, 1990; and Blue, 1993), Deborah Hoffman (Complaints
of a Dutiful Daughter, 1994) and scores of other producer/directors
created provocative work that situated the individual within a
decidedly cultural (and often historical) context.
By the mid-1980s,
some documentary critics and producers considered reflexivity
not only a stylistic choice, but an ethical imperative. Although
all autobiographical production is by definition reflexive (that
is, self-conscious), if not reflective (regarding its processes
of construction) (Ruby, 1988), a strain of autobiographical documentary
is particularly focused on its own construction process. Such
is the case with Silverlake Life: The View from Here (1993),
the poignant journal Tom Joslin made of his life, and death, which
a former student and friend completed after both Joslin and his
partner died of AIDS. Autodocumentaries structured as personal
accounts of the difficulties a film-maker faces in completing
a project range tonally to work that is wry, intensely engaged
with political struggle, and deeply sorrowful (for example, Jill
Godmilow's Far From Poland [1987] and Elia Suleiman's Chronicle
of a Disappearance [Segell Ikhifa], [1997]) to pieces
that are light and comical (such as Renos Haralambidi's No
Budget Story [1997]).
In the last
decades of the twentieth century, both literary and cinematic
autobiography was greatly influenced by Western European postmodern
theory. Many film and video-makers working in autobiographical
registers challenged the concept of the unified self as autodocumentary
became a means, and a method, for recognizing the construction
of identity and for confronting the paradox of reality fiction
at the core of all documentary production.
As confidence
in realism diminished (arguably more for filmmakers than for their
audiences), a performative turn permeated many types of documentary
production, blurring boundaries between fiction and non-fiction.
A growing number of producers of autodocumentary visualized their
dreams, nightmares, and fantasies through non-realist techniques
such as animation, stylized performance and theatrical set design,
continuing to pursue goals established a half century earlier
by experimental artists. Camille Billops and James Hatch's Finding
Christa (1991) and Kidlat Tahimik's Why Is Yellow the Middle
of the Rainbow (1981-1993) turn to expressive means to explore
subjectivity, while still retaining many traditional documentary
features. Tracey Moffat's stylized Night Cries: A Rural Tragedy,
(1989), although informed by the film maker's autobiography, crosses
an increasingly indeterminate line between performative autodocumentary
and experimental psychodrama.
Autodocumentaries
that explore the director's sexuality or gender identity frequently
approach documentation of sexual activity through striking experimental
methods that feature imagery of the filmmaker's body (and often
the body of her partner[s]) as physical presence(s), but also
attempt to visualize the phenomenology of erotic life. Carolee
Schneemann's Fuses (1964-67) remains a memorable example of this
tendency that is continued in Barbara Hammer's Women I Love
(1976) and Mindy Farber's The Man Within Me (1995).
Perennial
documentary concerns of authenticity and credibility are both
diffused and intensified with autodocumentaries. Since subjects
are usually not public figures, there are few reference points
outside the autodocumentary text; trust between film-maker and
spectator is (relatively) automatic (until or unless disrupted).
The fiction of David Holzman's Diary demonstrates how easily
that trust can be exploited and violated. Counterfeit images in
autodocumentaries are sometimes announced mid-film, as when Ruth
Ozeki Lounsbury notifies viewers of Halving the Bones (1995)
that she has "faked" archival family footage, but far
more often re-enactments or misappropriations are acknowledged
in ending credits, as in Marlon Fuentes's Bontoc Eulogy
(1995), which begs questions of authenticity in the tension between
historical specificity (about Fuentes's actual grandfather) and
cultural truth (about the display and mistreatment of Filipino
men as World Fair exhibits).
By the beginning
of the twenty-first century, production of autodocumentaries had
proliferated worldwide, partly through the accessibility of increasingly
inexpensive equipment and the global possibilities of Internet
distribution systems. Imaginative young artists like Sadie Benning
proved that even the most low-tech equipment (the short-lived
pixel vision camera) could, n the right hands, be used to produce
compelling, original (and in Benning's case, influential) autodocumentary.
Easily operated equipment makes the production of video diaries
feasible for amateurs. As digital production and distribution
technologies expand, so, too, will the number and the variety
of autobiographical documentaries.
Carolyn
Anderson
See also:
Ackerman, Chantal; Berliner, Alan; Brakhage, Stan; Deren, Maya;
Domestic Documentary, Finding Christa; Godmilow, Jill;
Guzzetti, Alfred;
History and Memory; Interviews; McElwee, Ross; Mocumentary;
Moffatt,
Tracey; Nana, Mom, and Me; Pincus, Edward; Reflexivity;
Riggs, Marlon; Video Diaries.
Further
Reading
Citron, Michelle, Home Movies and Other Necessary Fictions,
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Dyer, Richard,
Now You See It: Studies on Gay and Lesbian Film, London:
Routledge, 1990.
Eakin, Paul
John, Touching the World: Reference in Autobiography, Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1992.
Freeman,
Mark, Rewriting the Self: History, Memory, Narrative, New
York: Routledge, 1993.
Katz, John
Stuart, and Judith Milstein Katz, "Ethics and the Perception
of Ethics in Autobiographical Film," in Image Ethics:
The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film and Television,
edited by Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby, New York:
Oxford University Press, 1988.
Kuhn, Annette,
Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination, London:
Verso, 1995.
Lane, Jim,
The Autobiographical Documentary in America, Madison: University
of Wisconsin Press, 2002.
Olney, James,
ed. Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical, Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1980.
Rabinowitz,
Laura, Points of Resistance: Women, Power, and Politics in
the New York Avant-Garde Cinema, 1943-1971, Urbana: University
of Illinois Press, 1991.
Renov, Michael,
"The Subject in History: The New Autobiography in Film and
Video." Afterimage 17, no. 1 (summer 1989): 4-7.
Ruby, Jay,
"The Image Mirrored: Reflexivity and the Documentary Film,"
in New Challenges for Documentary, edited by Alan Rosenthal,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Ruoff, Jeffrey,
"Home Movies of the Avant-Garde: Jonas Mekas and the New
York Art World," Cinema Journal 30, no. 3 (spring
1991): 6-28.
Russell,
Catherine, Experimental Ethnography: The Work of Film in the
Age of Video, Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.
Zimmerman,
Patricia, Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film,
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.
Sample
Entries
Description
| Introduction | A-Z
Entries List | Thematic List of Entries
Contributors | Reviews
| Order
Information | Order Online
| Contact Us
Routledge
Library Reference Home